Why Standing Desks Don’t Fix Poor Ergonomics (And Can Sometimes Make Things Worse)

Standing desks have quickly become one of the most popular workplace investments. Many organisations introduce them with the belief that standing will automatically reduce injury risk, improve posture, and increase productivity.

The reality is more nuanced.

Standing desks are not inherently protective. In some cases, they introduce new problems when used without proper ergonomic guidance.

The Myth: Standing Is Better Than Sitting

Research does not support the idea that standing eliminates musculoskeletal risk. Both prolonged sitting and prolonged standing are forms of static load.

Extended standing increases:

• Lower limb fatigue

• Lumbar spine compression

• Calf and foot discomfort

• Postural strain when workstation height is incorrect

  
  

Standing is not a solution - it is simply another posture.

The Real Goal: Movement, Not Replacement

Effective ergonomics focuses on posture variation. Alternating between sitting and standing distributes load across tissues and reduces fatigue.

Best practice:

• Alternate positions every 30-60 minutes

• Avoid standing for long uninterrupted periods

• Use supportive footwear or anti-fatigue mats where appropriate

  
  

Common Standing Desk Mistakes

• Monitor too low, causing neck flexion

• Keyboard too high, elevating shoulders

• Leaning heavily into the desk

• Locking knees and reducing circulation

  
  

Standing desks work best when part of a broader ergonomic strategy, not as a standalone solution.

Key Takeaway

Standing desks are valuable tools, but only when they promote movement and correct positioning. The goal isn’t to sit less or stand more. The goal is to change position regularly and reduce static load.